Editorial Policy

How we publish

Construct uses AI-assisted research and drafting in its resource library. Drafts are proposed through pull requests and reviewed by a person before publication. Automation does not publish directly to the site.

Review covers search intent, factual claims, source quality, overlap with existing pages, internal links, and whether the article gives readers a useful answer beyond a summary of other sources.

Sources and comparisons

• Primary sources first where available. Product capabilities and limits should link to current vendor documentation; secondary research is identified when it supplies market data or reporting.
• Clear scope. Comparisons state their review date and whether they are editorial research or hands-on testing.
• No invented evidence. We do not present generated examples as measured benchmarks or first-hand tests.
• Construct claims. Product details are checked against the current product and may change as the beta evolves.

Authors, dates, and corrections

Articles published by the Construct Team represent the company rather than an individual contributor. Publication dates show when an article first appeared. Updated dates change only after a substantive content review, not simply to make a page appear fresh.

To report an error or outdated claim, email [email protected]. We correct material errors and update the page date when the correction materially changes the article.

Our standard

Our goal is useful, people-first material for teams evaluating or operating AI agents. We use Google’s helpful-content self-assessment as a review reference, not a formula for manufacturing search traffic.